Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 21:02:52 02/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2002 at 23:36:20, Terry McCracken wrote: >On February 19, 2002 at 23:11:44, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>This is it. After this opportunity, everything went exactly according to the pv >>one move after the next, with a steadily dropping evaluation: >> >>[D]8/5p2/4b2b/4Q3/4K1p1/7p/4k2P/8 b - - acd 19; acn 552208526; acs 1002; am Bd2; >>ce 0; pv Bf8 Qb2+ Ke1 Kd3 Kf1 Qe2+ Kg1 Qe1+ Kxh2 Qf2+ Kh1 Qf1+ Kh2 Qf2+; >> >>A painfull, agonizing death, which went exactly according to plan: >>8/5p2/4b3/4Q3/4K1p1/7p/3bk2P/8 w - - acd 16; acn 691073087; acs 1000; bm Kd4+; >>ce 140; pv Kd4+ Kf1 Kd3 Bh6 Qf6+ Kg1 Qxh6 Kxh2 Qd2+ Kg1 Ke3 f5 Qd6; >>8/5p2/4b3/4Q3/3K2p1/7p/3bk2P/8 b - - acd 18; acn 633065349; acs 1001; bm Kf1; ce >>-214; pv Kf1 Kd3 Bh6 Qf6+ Kg1 Qxh6 g3 hxg3 h2 Qe3+ Kg2 Qe2+ Kxg3 Qf1 Bh3 Qe1+ >>Kg2 Qe2+ Kg1 Qe3+ Kg2 Qe4+ Kf2 Qh1 Kg3; >>8/5p2/4b3/4Q3/3K2p1/7p/3b3P/5k2 w - - acd 17; acn 612163548; acs 1000; bm Kd3; >>ce 201; pv Kd3 Bb4 Qf4+ Kg1 Qxb4 g3 hxg3 h2 Qe1+ Kg2 Qe4+ Kg1 Qe3+ Kg2 Qe2+ Kxg3 >>Qe5+ Kh3 Qe4 Bg4 Ke3 f5 Qh1 Kg3; >>8/5p2/4b3/4Q3/6p1/3K3p/3b3P/5k2 b - - acd 17; acn 662321139; acs 1001; bm Bh6; >>ce -240; pv Bh6 Qf6+ Kg1 Qxh6 g3 hxg3 h2 Qe3+ Kg2 Qe4+ Kg1 Qe1+ Kg2 Qe2+ Kxg3 >>Qf1 Bh3 Qe1+ Kf3 Qe2+ Kg3 Qe5+ Kg2 Qg7+ Kf1 Qxf7+ Kg1 Qg6+ Bg2; >>8/5p2/4b2b/4Q3/6p1/3K3p/7P/5k2 w - - acd 16; acn 681772825; acs 999; bm Qf6+; ce >>214; pv Qf6+ Kg1 Qxh6 g3 hxg3 h2 Qe3+ Kg2 Qe2+ Kxg3 Qf1 Bg4 Ke3 f6 Qh1 Bh5 Ke4 >>Bg6+ Ke3; >>[D]8/5p2/4bQ1b/8/6p1/3K3p/7P/5k2 b - - acd 17; acn 606940561; acs 1001; bm Kg2; >>ce -327; pv Kg1 Qxh6 g3 hxg3 h2 Qe3+ Kg2 Qe2+ Kxg3 Qf1 Bh3 Qe1+ Kg2 Qe4+ Kg1 >>Qd4+ Kg2 Qg7+ Kf1 Qxf7+ Kg2 Qd5+ Kg1 Qg5+ Kf2 Qd5; >> >>Turn out the lights, the party's over... > > >I was impressed with RC4's play in this game, although poor van Loek should have >accepted the draw offer. > >I thought much earlier on he might have tried Bg7 and Bc3 with the sac for the >two pawns while the King was further away, but even that was at best a draw as >the King moves in and to prevent mate van Loek would have to underpromote to a >Knight. > >Of course he could have played safe and finally agreed to an easy draw. >Comps. don't tire and don't seem to be real familiar with time trouble!;-) > >Good Game and Congrates to Ed Schroder!! > >van Loek.....Wake up, you have White next game! > >Terry....Knowing all too well "Carbon Days" is slowly coming to an end! Sorry....Loek van Wely!! Terry....time for bed!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.