Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Maybe if Van Vely had read the book indicated by ChessBase News today...

Author: Sally Weltrop

Date: 23:28:35 02/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2002 at 16:53:14, Otello Gnaramori wrote:

>Chess - A psychiatrist matches Wits with Fritz
>19.02.2002 That is the name of a mysterious book that is being advertised on the
>Internet. They say it contains a compilation of over 125 games that
>systematically illustrate a strategy that succeeds in beating today’s best chess
>computer programs in less than 40 moves. The author is a psychiatrist who
>analyzed the thinking process behind chess computer programs. We have no further
>details, but have ordered the book. You never know, maybe we can learn a trick
>or two
>
>http://www.pavior.com/chessbook1/newindex.html

Maybe Kasparov should have waited and then played Deep Blue. He even gives the
forward in the book:

Foreword by Garry Kasparov


Today's supercomputers have an enormous advantage over human players. They can
store huge databases of opening moves as well as archives consisting of every
major chess game played by chess masters over the past century. Computer experts
have generated chess programs that have worked out all forcing lines possible in
any endgame enabling the computer to play "godlike" when each side is reduced to
six or less pieces. In reviewing Dr. Pecci’s book, I am intrigued to note that
he avoids the six-piece endgame, which would greatly favor the computer by
forcing a critical confrontation that decides the game long before an endgame
position.


The Pecci Strategy introduces a new way to approach the game of chess. Dr. Pecci
discovered that by changing his "mind set" about the game, he could, within a
half dozen moves, attain a board position that has no match even in the archives
of the large chess database systems available on the Internet. He goes "out of
book" by the third or fourth move, at which point the computer might as well
throw its entire database out the window. In the past, I have suggested that for
humans to compete against the chess supercomputers of the future, we might try
shuffling the starting positions of the pieces. In his book, Dr. Pecci has
arrived at a creative approach to the game that accomplishes essentially the
same thing, that is, rendering useless the computer’s opening book database.


When I played Deep Blue, my intention was to make relatively "soft" initial
moves until I had established positional advantage. The Pecci Strategy also
makes relatively "soft" moves in order to establish a strong position. He
succeeds primarily because the computer is not programmed to recognize the
threat of what he calls "a Barrage Position", thereby offering relatively little
resistance to this position to which it awards a relatively low score. From this
position, careful, but persistent play along his predetermined line of attack
results in a gradual rise in his score with a predictable victory in 30-40
moves. He gives examples of games, which, when analyzed by the Fritz 6 analytic
engine, exhibit no weakness in black’s response to white’s attack. Fritz 6 is a
highly specialized computer chess program. You’re playing against the whole
world and all previous grand masters whose complete body of games is
incorporated into the database. On an 800 MHz Pentium III computer the chess
program considers over 400,000 moves per second. When the analytic chess engine
is allowed up to three minutes before making a move, it is a formidable
opponent. His attempt to beat the computer in fewer than 40 moves increases the
difficulty of his task, but also results in interesting examples of sacrificing
pawns, ignoring material advantage and making calculated sacrifices to
exterminate the enemy as quickly as possible. Ordinarily, any method of play
that fails to consider controlling the center of the board would be foolhardy
and doomed to failure against stiff competition. Against Fritz 6, however, this
is precisely the approach Dr. Pecci has taken, with great success.


When I first received a galley proof of this book, I found it very interesting
that someone who was not a professional chess player was able to consistently
outplay Fritz 6. It was initially difficult to evaluate these games in the same
manner in which I evaluate conventional games. It is not an easy thing to shift
the way in which you have seen something all of your life. In fact, were it not
for my curiosity, I doubt I would have persisted long enough to finish the
manuscript. I’m glad I did. I found myself exploring a talent of the human mind
no machine may ever be able to do. I can only call it "creative intuition".
While I have used these words before, until now I never fully realized how
special, and universal, this talent truly is. This is what I have been trying to
accomplish with my school, to use the medium of chess to develop this talent in
children everywhere. Chess offers many opportunities for developing the mind in
many different directions.


Until I read this book and examined many of the games, I believed that no person
in the world could look at a chess game and tell whether it was played by a
human or by a computer. In this book, however, the experienced chess player will
clearly identify the side played by a human player. I am particularly interested
in Dr. Pecci’s assertion that, aside from making the sequencing of moves
somewhat more critical, the calculating power of the computer makes little
difference, and at best, it can only delay the outcome of the game by ten to
fifteen moves. It remains to be seen whether human players are as susceptible to
the strategies introduced in this book. This deserves further evaluation by
anyone who is serious about the game of chess and especially those, including
myself, who enjoy playing Rapid Chess.


There are plenty of new moves to be discovered in the game of Chess. Remember,
after all, that Chess is a mathematically "infinite" game. Of course,
calculation can be pushed ever closer to its ultimate limit, and the closer one
comes to that limit the more difficult each step becomes. Many chess authorities
say the current state of chess playing is endangered by repeated "death by draw"
games as a result of playing moves that press closer and closer to the ultimate
and unreachable limit of calculation. The renewal of chess as the exciting match
of wits and strategy at its best lies in the leap offered by creativity through
intuition. The new approaches offered in this book present one possibility out
of that "field of all possibilities" reachable through the intuitive connections
of the human mind infused with sound tactics and strategy. In understanding the
concept of the "intuitive connection" from which new ideas emerge, mastery of
the game of chess can reach genuinely new levels of play.


Without question, computers will play an increasingly influential role in the
way chess is played in the 21st Century. I think that the form of what I call
Advanced Chess (Man and Machine) will become very popular. The contest is far
from over, and until the machine wins every game we are still in the contest. I
believe that future world champions, because of the heavy influence of
computers, will be making changes in "attitude" and "approach" rather than
strength. Hopefully, this will revive the public interest in the game of chess
and encourage corporate sponsorship of matches against supercomputers such as
Deep Blue.


As a world champion, one of my objectives is to bring chess back into the
mainstream. Chess became very popular with matches like the one I played with
Deep Blue in 1996 and 1997, and all the publicity following these two matches
proved my earlier assessment that the man versus machine contest would be one of
the most exciting social and scientific experiments going into the 21st century.
This kind of competition brings to the scientists the best field for
investigation possible between human "intuition and creativity" and the brute
force of the machine's calculating ability. I believe that this very interesting
and provocative book by Dr. Pecci may help to reopen the question of the
superiority of Man versus Machine. His book is well worth reading and is sure to
have a far-reaching influence on shaping new ways to approach the game of chess
as well as influencing the future development of chess computer programs.

- Garry Kasparov, May 2001








This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.