Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:02:10 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2002 at 07:53:07, Terry McCracken wrote: >On February 20, 2002 at 07:46:53, Graham Laight wrote: > >>On February 20, 2002 at 07:38:31, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On February 20, 2002 at 06:17:49, Graham Laight wrote: >>> >>>>On February 20, 2002 at 06:12:59, Tony Werten wrote: >>>> >>>>>Fritz ended on fourth place, and got 2 points for free. It did show grandmaster >>>>>play but only if the opponents were unwise and played "normal" chess. Against >>>>>those that didn't Fritz looked like a starter. Check fe the games against vd >>>>>Wiel and v Wely. There are more, even 2 that Fritz did win. >>>>> >>>>>It will be while until the computers can look like grandmasters if confronted >>>>>with anti-computerplay. >>> >>>>>Tony >>>> >>>>I thought Loek van Wely was supposed to be an anti-computer expert? >>>> >>>>If so, he has 3 games left to prove it! >>>> >>>>-g >>>> >>> >>>I think you're mixing up Loek van Wely, with John Van der Wiel. >>> >>>Terry >> >>If so, then the theory that anti-computer play will defeat chess computers is >>already disproven - see http://www.rebel.nl/rebwiel.htm >> >>-g > >I know all about it. And quite frankly you're wrong. It's amusing to watch >Edward Nameth (sp)? prove Anti-Computer play quite often at this forum! > >Terry It proves nothing. We need games when the human cannot control the computer's opening book and cannot take back moves. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.