Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 05:07:24 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2002 at 08:02:10, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 20, 2002 at 07:53:07, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On February 20, 2002 at 07:46:53, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>On February 20, 2002 at 07:38:31, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On February 20, 2002 at 06:17:49, Graham Laight wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 20, 2002 at 06:12:59, Tony Werten wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Fritz ended on fourth place, and got 2 points for free. It did show grandmaster >>>>>>play but only if the opponents were unwise and played "normal" chess. Against >>>>>>those that didn't Fritz looked like a starter. Check fe the games against vd >>>>>>Wiel and v Wely. There are more, even 2 that Fritz did win. >>>>>> >>>>>>It will be while until the computers can look like grandmasters if confronted >>>>>>with anti-computerplay. >>>> >>>>>>Tony >>>>> >>>>>I thought Loek van Wely was supposed to be an anti-computer expert? >>>>> >>>>>If so, he has 3 games left to prove it! >>>>> >>>>>-g >>>>> >>>> >>>>I think you're mixing up Loek van Wely, with John Van der Wiel. >>>> >>>>Terry >>> >>>If so, then the theory that anti-computer play will defeat chess computers is >>>already disproven - see http://www.rebel.nl/rebwiel.htm >>> >>>-g >> >>I know all about it. And quite frankly you're wrong. It's amusing to watch >>Edward Nameth (sp)? prove Anti-Computer play quite often at this forum! >> >>Terry > >It proves nothing. >We need games when the human cannot control the computer's opening book and >cannot take back moves. > >Uri Well that's assuming if Edward is cheating! Maybe he is but there are many tricks to trip up machines and that is a fact! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.