Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: VAN Wely wins - Terrible, Tragic Setback For Ed.

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 10:00:36 02/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 20, 2002 at 12:28:42, Uri Blass wrote:

>On February 20, 2002 at 12:23:32, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On February 20, 2002 at 12:12:55, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>
>>>Weak? I think Van Reek is a little bit stronger than you or I
>>
>>Van Reek doesn't seem to be in the database, so I have no
>>idea if he is stronger than Vincent, however, I think
>>Vincent was reffering to his strenght relative to the players.
>
>No
>It seems that he meant to his strength relative to the player who is reponsible
>for the comments about the game in
>http://www.chessevents.nl/Vanwely/analysis_jvr/wely_jvr2.htm
>
>Uri

My biggest comments is that because a 60 year old guy wants to
add a few lines of comments, the match is not shown live on the
internet.

Further his analysis suck too from whatever respect. Strong or weak.

Let's not mention the world top opponent who is facing Rebel.

Another weak thing is he cut'n pastes fritz 5.32 analysis at his
laptop in chessbase, which is getting a few seconds a move.

based upon fritz5.32 analysis he concludes a move to be right or good
which was played by Rebel at a 1.xx Ghz machine (if not faster) at
over 3 minutes a move with huge hashtables.

That principle sucks of course.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.