Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:14:12 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2002 at 20:19:59, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On February 18, 2002 at 18:40:18, Frank Nelson wrote: > >>I tried fireside.anti-computer strategy and got buried by Hiarcs 7.32! >>I used f4-e3-d4-c3 formation only to watch Hiarcs open it up like a knife >>to a watermelon. I had a book once which said that studying the games of >>David Bronstein vs. computers was the right direction for anti-computers. >>I think that a person has to use his own common sense when playing against a >>computer. Computers don't get tired unless they are running on batteries >>and is usually good at forcing a desirable tactical variation. I think that most >>people play well when the opening is over then start to tire move-by-move and >>then blunder in a level position. The computer of course then take the >>initiative until it leads to a + - ! If anyone have some original anti-computer >>strategy please post to this CCC newsgroup. Thanks in advance. >> >>Ljubomir Nelson >Given the strength of current programs there is no such thing anymore.Rebel is >eating VanWely alive .Maybe this was true 10 years.If you are not a GM you >dont have a chance against a program Loek is eating rebel alive. he wanted to win first game a bit too soon and did a very dubious king walk. then he lost because he wanted to win. Rebel nowhere had real chances in both games till Loek blundered in game 1 somewhere near the end of the game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.