Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:16:15 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2002 at 04:09:08, Graham Laight wrote: >Having won this excellent game, I have a feeling that Ed will be strongly >tempted the program Rebel to play safe, and try to obtain 3 draws to get an >overall victory. How far away the comments is from reality. Rebel would have been called lucky if it drew that game. Loek blundered a piece away in the end because he wanted to win too badly. Borrow 2000 rating points somewhere and analyse the game i'd say. Van Reek has some rating points he is not worth anymore. perhaps you can get them from free from him :) >IMHO, this would be a grave mistake. van Wely must be prevented from carrying >out his plans. IMO, the best way to achieve this is to continue to hit him with >what he's been getting so far - constant challenges (including sacrifices) which >force him to keep responding to what's happening at the present moment - thus >preventing him from effectively carrying out his own plans. > >No more draw offers please - I want to see a whitewash delivered by a single >processor machine now - and a permanent end to the perenial "are PCs GM" debate. > >-g
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.