Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 13:32:47 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2002 at 15:38:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 20, 2002 at 15:20:44, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: > >>On February 20, 2002 at 14:32:25, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On February 20, 2002 at 14:23:13, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 20, 2002 at 13:38:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 20, 2002 at 13:05:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 20, 2002 at 12:11:25, Joshua Lee wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>I guess this is why Crafty has code for colle/stonewall?! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I wonder how much time does it take Rebel to see it made losing moves, has >>>>>>>anyone looked at this? >>>>>> >>>>>>No program has code for that Joshua. A strategic concept is not >>>>>>programmable. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If you are talking about the Stonewall stuff, it is recognizable and >>>>>avoidable without a lot of work. Colle systems are the same if you use >>>>>the simple "don't block the c pawn with a knight" approach which lets you >>>>>avoid the more closed stuff... >>>> >>>>Do not confuse simple positional patterns with >>>>strategic concepts of the stonewall please. >>> >>>Mr. Diepeeven, c'mon Dr. Hyatt knows what he's talking about....he's been >>>programming for some 30 years! >> >>Vincent was talking about chess, not about programming. >>Then again, both were talking about different things, one about avoiding >>the opening, the other how to play it. >> >>Miguel >> > >Correct. And it is possible to do both, of course. A computer doesn't >necessarily have to understand something as clearly as a human does in order >to cope with it effectively, something that is often overlooked. But it >does have to understand it in some sort of way or it will get bombed of course. > >I used to spend a lot of time tweaking my book to avoid the zillion different >ways to transpose into the Stonewall. I now no longer even think about it as >it simply doesn't come up. > > > > >> >>> >>>Terry Well what is wrong with I analyses i posted with 2.Qd3!? or g3 and later on Qd3. How simple can it be? Regards Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.