Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:04:50 02/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2002 at 16:32:47, Marc van Hal wrote: > >Well what is wrong with I analyses i posted with 2.Qd3!? >or g3 and later on Qd3. >How simple can it be? > >Regards Marc I don't think you have to play "suck chess" to beat a computer. 2. Qd3 is wrong for many reasons that are well-documented. There are other "plans" that don't invite the machine onto your side of the board chasing the queen all over.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.