Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:47:56 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 09:25:33, pavel wrote: >On February 21, 2002 at 09:23:27, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 21, 2002 at 08:54:59, pavel wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>Fritz 7 (2500) - Shredder 6 (2500) [A48] >>>Best, Blitz:720' Home (1), 20.02.2002 >>> >>>W=21.2 ply; 549kN/s; 423,104 TBAs >>>B=28.4 ply; 239kN/s; 14,907,334 TBAs >>> 1.d2-d4 Ng8-f6 2.Ng1-f3 g7-g6 3.Bc1-g5 Bf8-g7 4.c2-c3 0-0 5.Nb1-d2 d7-d6 >>>6.e2-e4 c7-c5 7.Bf1-d3 Black last book move 7...c5xd4 0.47/15 18:14 8.c3xd4 >>>e7-e5 White last book move 0.48/15 16:37 9.d4xe5 0.28/14 17:45 d6xe5 >>>0.41/12 28 10.Bd3-c4 (Nd2-c4) 0.25/15 29:50 10...Nb8-c6 0.44/14 12:00 >>>11.Ra1-c1 (0-0) 0.25/15 23:24 11...Nc6-a5 0.10/14 13:59 12.Bc4-d5 (Bc4-e2) >>> 0.38/15 29:32 12...Qd8-b6 0.34/14 12:24 13.0-0 0.34/16 49:33 Nf6xd5 >>>0.09/15 17:40 14.e4xd5 0.34/14 3:12 Qb6-b5 (h7-h6) 0.11/15 16:12 >>>15.Nd2-e4 0.34/15 16:17 f7-f6 0.20/14 16:57 16.Bg5-e3 0.28/15 22:46 >>>Rf8-d8 (b7-b6) 0.10/14 12:59 17.Rc1-c5 (Ne4-c3) 0.50/14 11:41 17...Qb5-b4 >>>0.32/14 7:13 18.Qd1-c2 0.44/15 13:48 Bc8-f5 0.42/15 14:12 19.Nf3-d2 >>>0.50/16 22:54 b7-b6 0.40/15 24:43 20.Rc5-c7 0.53/15 17:13 Rd8-c8 >>>(Qb4-b5) 0.43/14 16:33 21.d5-d6 (f2-f3) 0.59/14 13:41 21...Rc8xc7 0.51/15 >>> 25:33 22.d6xc7 0.59/14 2:48 Ra8-c8 0.34/15 10:46 23.Rf1-c1 0.78/15 >>>13:33 Qb4-e7 0.39/14 14:03 24.b2-b4 (Qc2-c3) 0.84/15 12:53 24...Qe7xb4 >>>1.57/14 10:37 25.Qc2-d3 0.97/16 16:45 Qb4-f8 (Qb4-e7) 1.47/14 11:49 >>>26.h2-h3 (Qd3-d5+) 1.03/14 7:38 26...h7-h6 1.27/15 16:43 27.g2-g4 >>>(Qd3-d5+) 1.13/15 11:55 27...Bf5xe4 (Bf5-e6) 1.73/15 10:24 28.Nd2xe4 >>>1.16/15 2:49 Qf8-e7 1.13/11 11 29.Qd3-d5+ 1.19/15 8:27 Kg8-h8 0.87/16 >>>9:24 30.Qd5-d6 1.06/16 8:02 Bg7-f8 0.87/17 18:05 31.Qd6xf6+ 0.94/17 >>>8:59 Qe7xf6 1.01/12 9 32.Ne4xf6 1.16/16 3:44 Kh8-g7 0.92/17 10:40 >>>33.Nf6-e4 0.88/17 16:59 Na5-b7 0.83/16 6:59 34.Rc1-c6 0.84/16 8:41 >>>Nb7-a5 0.94/17 10:12 35.Rc6-c2 0.88/16 6:35 Na5-b7 1.01/16 8:09 >>>36.f2-f4 0.84/16 9:58 Nb7-c5 (Kg7-f7) 1.19/17 22:32 37.Ne4xc5 1.09/17 >>>8:38 b6xc5 1.27/20 8:07 38.Be3xc5 1.22/19 8:30 Bf8xc5+ 1.40/21 8:18 >>>39.Rc2xc5 1.25/19 1:27 e5xf4 1.40/22 8:56 40.Rc5-c6 1.25/20 8:40 g6-g5 >>>1.37/23 5:30 41.Kg1-f2 1.53/20 6:56 Kg7-f8 1.51/23 13:32 42.Kf2-f3 >>>1.69/20 9:56 a7-a5 (Kf8-g7) 1.74/20 9:15 43.h3-h4 (a2-a4) 1.63/19 8:16 >>>43...g5xh4 (a5-a4) 1.94/21 14:26 44.Kf3xf4 1.88/19 4:18 Kf8-e7 (a5-a4) >>>2.83/21 7:59 45.Rc6xh6 2.78/19 4:49 Rc8xc7 3.24/22 10:49 46.Rh6-h7+ >>>2.91/20 3:33 Ke7-d6 3.07/20 5 47.Rh7xc7 2.66/21 5:55 Kd6xc7 3.24/27 >>>7:30 48.g4-g5 2.31/23 2:52 h4-h3 (Kc7-d8) 3.24/26 4:00 49.Kf4-g3 2.50/23 >>> 6:01 Kc7-d6 (Kc7-d8) 3.24/25 20 50.Kg3xh3 2.44/24 3:08 Kd6-e6 (Kd6-e7) >>>3.21/78 5:28 51.Kh3-g3 (Kh3-g4) 0.00/47 2:30 51...a5-a4 (Ke6-f7) 0.00/99 >>>29 52.Kg3-g4 0.00/47 12 Ke6-f7 0.00/99 0 53.Kg4-h3 (Kg4-h5) 0.00/47 30 >>>53...Kf7-g6 (Kf7-g7) 0.00/97 5:33 54.Kh3-h4 (Kh3-g4) 0.00/47 20 >>>54...Kg6-f7 (Kg6-g7) 0.00/99 58 55.a2-a3 (Kh4-g4) 0.00/47 6 55...Kf7-g6 >>>Draw accepted 0.00/99 2 ½-½ >>> >>>========================================= >>> >>>Comments: The first game that I played was cancelled due to flawed time >>>setting,, from Uri's suggestion this games were played on 12hr/side. >>>This game was much better than the first game, and the amount of time the >>>programs spend on each move was amazing. >>> >>>I didn't chose the other time setting suggested by Uri coz I didn't think there >>>was much of a differance between them , and there is no proof that the other >>>setting is better for shredder. >>> >>>Not to mention, id shredder doesn't understand this setting that it's his fault. >>>(not that i think it doesn't). >>> >>>check out the evals flying around ;) >>> >>> >>>pavs >> >>It seems that both sides did not use the KPPvs KP tablebases >>50.Kxh3 and 50...Ke6 with positive score for white are impossible with these >>tablebases. >> >>It seems to be drawn after 45.Rxh6 and I gues that the programss with >>the right tablebases have no problem to see it. >> >>Uri > >What could be the reason? >I have all the 3-4-and some 5 men TBs. > >pavs do you use the KPP vs KP in your game? It seems based on the evaluations that the programs did not use them. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.