Author: pavel
Date: 07:35:39 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 10:19:25, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Well, I was right and some experts here were wrong. I said: Rebel can win one or >perhaps two wins from now on after the so calld "terrible defeat". They even >said: no way, Rebel will not get a point from now on. He knows nothing. Just >tactics. Etc >Conclusion: olfative conditions are more worthy than expertisse, once and again. >Too many times experts are those guys that dig deeper and deeper his hole in >order to see less and less all around. >Fernando I think you got it all wrong. Even i could predict that, random predicting doesnt make you expert. In computer-human games, everyday is a differant day, because you have a differant openning, differant mentality (for human), and thus a differant game. Maybe Van Wely didn't have a good breakfast this morning, who knows? By the way, not "they", if I am not wrong, only one person said Van Wely won't get anymore points after the second game. Well "they" said, anything can happen. read the thread again. I am waiting for your "part III" post. ;) pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.