Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:31:00 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 10:19:25, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Well, I was right and some experts here were wrong. I said: Rebel can win one or >perhaps two wins from now on after the so calld "terrible defeat". They even >said: no way, Rebel will not get a point from now on. He knows nothing. Just >tactics. Etc >Conclusion: olfative conditions are more worthy than expertisse, once and again. >Too many times experts are those guys that dig deeper and deeper his hole in >order to see less and less all around. >Fernando Yes it would help the so-called experts to be a little more objective.... It is clear that the computer record against Grandmaster players is no fluke. No matter what some experts here argue. Computer programs on micros are very strong GM level players. Yes computers are stupid in many ways, and only understand tactics...but the computers keep winning. Some so called experts keep ignoring that fact.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.