Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:36:30 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 10:35:39, pavel wrote: >On February 21, 2002 at 10:19:25, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Well, I was right and some experts here were wrong. I said: Rebel can win one or >>perhaps two wins from now on after the so calld "terrible defeat". They even >>said: no way, Rebel will not get a point from now on. He knows nothing. Just >>tactics. Etc >>Conclusion: olfative conditions are more worthy than expertisse, once and again. >>Too many times experts are those guys that dig deeper and deeper his hole in >>order to see less and less all around. >>Fernando > > >I think you got it all wrong. >Even i could predict that, random predicting doesnt make you expert. >In computer-human games, everyday is a differant day, because you have a >differant openning, differant mentality (for human), and thus a differant game. > >Maybe Van Wely didn't have a good breakfast this morning, who knows? > >By the way, not "they", if I am not wrong, only one person said Van Wely won't >get anymore points after the second game. >Well "they" said, anything can happen. > >read the thread again. > >I am waiting for your "part III" post. ;) I will give you the only two answers to the part 3 post. Rebel wins match, or Rebel draws match against Van Wely. > > >pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.