Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 10:48:47 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 10:02:14, Jose Menendez wrote: >Unlike some people who talk alot of smack and demonstrate little, hyatt, >vincent, come to mind. 1) First slander of this unconscious and provocative message: Question: How can you that Bob Hyatt or Vincent Diepeveen demonstrate little? When did you forget what Crafty and Diep are? Maybe you think that these programs don't show anything about Bob Hyatt or Vincent Diepeveen? Or you don't really know who is Bob Hyatt or Vincent Diepeveen? >Both these clowns are very jealous of Mr Shroeder and >would like to see him fail at all cost, 2) Good, I have never known that Bob Hyatt or Vincent Diepeveen worked in a circus. ;) Or did you recommend them that work? I have never known that Bob Hyatt or Vincent Diepeveen are jealous of the Ed Shroeder's work. Do you have proves to affirm or confirm what you are saying? AFAIF, Ed Shroeder is respected by most of the Authors because the long time that he has been developing its powerful and strenght program. >this is why when Ed wins, we hear >nothing from these clowns, but when he loses then they post a million times >about how weak computers are. 3) You don't understand the sense of the Match against VAN Wely. If Rebel win the Match, it is publishing that Rebel can beat a GrandMaster. Not only Rebel has lost against humans, but also against Computers. What is the problem to comment the game? Oh, Sir. How can you say that you never hear anything about Bob Hyatt or Vincent Diepeveen. They have decreased the postings in this Forum, because of nonsense attacks. I only say you must moderate your posting here or the Moderators should do something with such provocate Messages fullful of offenses. Good, sir, have a nice weekend. Regards, Arturo Ochoa.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.