Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 15:16:05 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 12:31:00, Mark Young wrote: >On February 21, 2002 at 10:19:25, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Well, I was right and some experts here were wrong. I said: Rebel can win one or >>perhaps two wins from now on after the so calld "terrible defeat". They even >>said: no way, Rebel will not get a point from now on. He knows nothing. Just >>tactics. Etc >>Conclusion: olfative conditions are more worthy than expertisse, once and again. >>Too many times experts are those guys that dig deeper and deeper his hole in >>order to see less and less all around. >>Fernando > > >Yes it would help the so-called experts to be a little more objective.... It is >clear that the computer record against Grandmaster players is no fluke. No >matter what some experts here argue. Computer programs on micros are very strong >GM level players. Yes computers are stupid in many ways, and only understand >tactics... You hit the point...since we know how tactics is often under-evaluated by the experts cited by you. w.b.r. Otello but the computers keep winning. Some so called experts keep ignoring >that fact.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.