Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 15:23:30 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 17:18:52, martin fierz wrote: >>i would say, computers today resemble a manic-depressive supergrandmaster in >their results - not in their play. there are many positions which they do not >understand. they can achieve the same performance as a grandmaster quite often, >and yet they are totally clueless in whole classes of positions, Very few indeed nowadays and especially found in endgames, but there are tablebases for that... which even >human beginners can understand. >people like me say that computers are not grandmasters, because they have >completely different capabilities than a grandmaster - they reach the same ends >by *totally* different means. i'm not saying they play worse performancewise. >but they are something different. you cannot compare apples and oranges :-) > If that is your point the match between Human and comps are nonsense for you ? w.b.r. Otello >aloha > martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.