Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 23:42:16 02/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2002 at 12:36:30, Mark Young wrote:
>On February 21, 2002 at 10:35:39, pavel wrote:
>
>>On February 21, 2002 at 10:19:25, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>
>>>Well, I was right and some experts here were wrong. I said: Rebel can win one or
>>>perhaps two wins from now on after the so calld "terrible defeat". They even
>>>said: no way, Rebel will not get a point from now on. He knows nothing. Just
>>>tactics. Etc
>>>Conclusion: olfative conditions are more worthy than expertisse, once and again.
>>>Too many times experts are those guys that dig deeper and deeper his hole in
>>>order to see less and less all around.
>>>Fernando
>>
>>
>>I think you got it all wrong.
>>Even i could predict that, random predicting doesnt make you expert.
>>In computer-human games, everyday is a differant day, because you have a
>>differant openning, differant mentality (for human), and thus a differant game.
>>
>>Maybe Van Wely didn't have a good breakfast this morning, who knows?
--------------------
There are always excuses made for players who lose, Rebel simply made
consistantly better moves than it's opponent!
Regards,
Terry
>>
>>By the way, not "they", if I am not wrong, only one person said Van Wely won't
>>get anymore points after the second game.
>>Well "they" said, anything can happen.
>>
>>read the thread again.
>>
>>I am waiting for your "part III" post. ;)
>
>I will give you the only two answers to the part 3 post. Rebel wins match, or
>Rebel draws match against Van Wely.
>
>>
>>
>>pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.