Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: If Rebel Were....

Author: Paul Doire

Date: 10:50:20 02/22/02

Go up one level in this thread

On February 22, 2002 at 13:46:00, Albert Silver wrote:

>On February 22, 2002 at 13:24:30, Paul Doire wrote:
>
>>On cpu equivalent of 6.4Ghz (4x stronger than match cpu).
>>
>>Does that mean it could have gotten 2820 performance rating ?(based on whenever
>>processor speed doubles programs increase in strength 50-70elo)
>
>Not necessarily. The performance is based on its results against humans and not
>automatically adding points in proportion to the speed. Suppose it still weren't
>able to do any better than 2-2 against Van Wely on such hardware? You see, that
>extra ply might not mean it will suddenly beat Van Wely in 40/2h.
>
>                                     Albert


What will it take to win against humans 75% of the time?
>
>>
>>Will we have off the shelf world champion caliber silicon beasts by 2005 ??
>>
>>What do you think?
>>
>>Paul

• Re: If Rebel Were.... Albert Silver 10:56:43 02/22/02
  • Re: If Rebel Were.... Paul Doire 10:59:28 02/22/02
    • Re: If Rebel Were.... Albert Silver 11:00:40 02/22/02
      • Re: If Rebel Were.... Paul Doire 11:10:29 02/22/02
        • Re: If Rebel Were.... Albert Silver 11:46:36 02/22/02
          • Thanks Albert (nt) Paul Doire 11:57:11 02/22/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.