Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:56:39 02/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2002 at 16:48:53, Albert Silver wrote:
>Oh yes, and one more thing: the highest rating possible has nothing to do with
>the TC. 100% is 100%.
And will you look at these dissapointing results:
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draw
1 Yace 0.99.50 : 313 32 109 183 87.2 % -20 12.6
2 AnMon-509 : 296 91 203 31 83.9 % 10 12.9
3 Nejmet-260 : 284 116 191 23 78.3 % 61 17.4
4 Crafty-18.10 : 268 123 146 21 78.6 % 42 33.3
5 MAD-005 : 267 118 198 23 76.1 % 66 13.0
6 AnMon-510 : 266 108 159 26 76.9 % 57 23.1
7 Phalanx-xxii : 264 114 186 25 74.0 % 82 12.0
8 TCBishop-4601 : 261 118 198 23 76.1 % 60 13.0
9 LG2000V3 : 260 112 235 25 76.0 % 60 0.0
10 TCBishop-0045 : 258 121 178 23 73.9 % 77 17.4
11 Gromit3 : 256 116 133 24 75.0 % 65 33.3
WOOF! Yace at 313 ELO?! How can that be. I better go and slap him down before
he wakes up from his stupor and starts pounding me again.
And what about this (on the tail end):
80 Blikskottel-05 : -486 342 41 26 3.8 % 73 7.7
81 Raffaela-005 : -518 0 0 22 0.0 % 82 0.0
82 Mustang-172 : -525 0 0 19 0.0 % 75 0.0
83 NeroWB-5 : -528 0 0 24 0.0 % 72 0.0
84 Tamerlane-01 : -529 0 0 24 0.0 % 71 0.0
85 ChadChess-015 : -530 0 0 23 0.0 % 70 0.0
86 EnginMax-260 : -535 381 0 24 2.1 % 65 4.2
87 Golem01 : -550 0 0 22 0.0 % 50 0.0
88 Noonian-29 : -553 386 0 23 2.2 % 47 4.3
What can it all mean?
Ahhh... it occurs to me.
These games were at very slow time control! G/2 hours.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.