Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:18:45 02/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2002 at 17:14:56, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >On February 22, 2002 at 17:07:34, Dann Corbit wrote: >>On February 22, 2002 at 17:03:57, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>>You missunderstand completly what the elo formula is:1.there are no negative >>>ratings. >>Why not? Can you explain the lack of these negative ratings using the field of >>analysis? And would that be complex analysis or numerical analysis or some >>completely unrelated field of analysis? >> >>>2.A rating of 1000 elo (forexample) in Novice level).You should read >>>some >>>of the original papres by ELo on his System.Can I help? >> >>I've got them actually. Here is a program I wrote to calculate ELO USCF: >>ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/tournament_software/USCF.C >>ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/tournament_software/USCF.H >> >>HTH >In reality there are many negative quantities in both numerical and Complex >analysis(and PDE,s) . So you do Partial Differential Equations? Sounds like Numerical Analsys then --same as me! Do you try to solve numerically or analytically? What is your favorite method of solution for a stiff equation over many variables? >Although the Cauchy integral formula was the first thing >that came to my mind when you said."Complex analysis" ,but I dont think Elo >alowed negative numbers in his System That's funny, I get them all the time. But it must be something wrong with my math.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.