Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 19:25:53 02/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2002 at 17:25:49, Manfred Schubert wrote: >PGN standard says that a variation is a move that may be legally played after >one move is taken back. But does that include the move that already has been >played (and taken back)? > > >Thanks! > >Manfred Hello Manfred, I'm not sure I follow the question. I think that what the standard is saying that in PGN first you have to enter the textmove, then the variation on that move, a move that was not actually played but could be played instead of the textmove. Why should the textmove be part of the variation? It wouldn't be a variation anymore then? Maybe I totally misunderstood your question. Regards, Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.