Author: Manfred Schubert
Date: 20:54:00 02/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2002 at 22:25:53, Eelco de Groot wrote: >I'm not sure I follow the question. I think that what the standard is saying >that in PGN first you have to enter the textmove, then the variation on that >move, a move that was not actually played but could be played instead of the >textmove. Why should the textmove be part of the variation? It wouldn't be a >variation anymore then? Maybe I totally misunderstood your question. No, you understood it quite well it think. That's exactly my question. PGN standard says a variation starts with a move that can be legally played after the last move has been taken back. But it doesn't say if that includes or excludes that exact move that was already made. There is PGN out there that does this, my question is if this is valid PGN or not. Manfred
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.