Author: Manfred Rosenboom
Date: 22:27:35 02/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2002 at 23:54:00, Manfred Schubert wrote: >PGN standard says a variation starts with a move that can be legally played >after the last move has been taken back. But it doesn't say if that includes or >excludes that exact move that was already made. > >There is PGN out there that does this, my question is if this is valid PGN or >not. Like Eelco mentioned: the move itself can't be part of the variation, because the variation is an alternative line of play. E.g.: if the main line in the initial position is 1.e4 and you want to mention, that 1.d4 is an alternative line of play, you have to write 1. e4 (1.d4) Another Manfred
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.