Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:00:33 02/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2002 at 19:38:30, pavel wrote: >On February 28, 2002 at 19:29:18, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On February 28, 2002 at 19:18:46, pavel wrote: >>[snip] >>>yes I do believe that too. >>>from my experience I can vouch for that. >>>so you suggest 100 games per opponent or 500 games per opponent? >>>pr maybe 100 games per opponent per round? >> >>The SSDF generally has about 400 to 1000 games for each chess program. >>http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/list.htm >> >>If you want greater accuracy, you will need more than that. > >yes thats true. > >perhaps 2 things differant from SSDF, only strong engines will be tested, The programs tested are always commercial quality for SSDF. The only amateur engine tested so far is Crafty (I believe that Yace may also be in the queue for testing). > and >the games will be available for free to download (I maybe wrong, but I didnt see >the games to be available free for download in their weboage). Those are here: http://home.interact.se/~w100107/welcome.htm >so now swinging between 60/side to 120/60' 120/60' all/60, what time control to >choose, in your opinion? The slower the better for the quality of the games. But the fewer that you can create for calibration. >does it make any differance? Matter of opinion, I suppose. I would run whatever is the most pleasing to you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.