Author: Mike S.
Date: 11:48:11 03/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 01, 2002 at 08:47:19, Jorge Pichard wrote: >You are correct that is why I am going to test it using standard SSDF time >control with a least 40 games against shredder 6.0, and depending on the result >I might even test it against Chess Tiger and Gambit Tiger too. To compare the performance with the default setting, or any other setting, it would be necessary to play from the *same opening lines* than in the comparison match. Without that, I think the openings chosen will have more influence than the settings. If I would do that (which I don't), I'd set the priority to a higher number of games rather than to long time controls. I think, 120 games from 40/40:00 give a more reliable result that 40 games from 40/2h. Furthermore it would probably be useful to use a set of opening positions similar to the Nunn openings (as an openings database) for that experiment. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.