Author: leonid
Date: 09:33:37 03/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
>>Hi, Tim! >> >>Are you sure about 9 moves solution? Or I tried some different position from >>what is here, or you put wrong on your side. This position mine looked 9 moves >>deep by brute force and found no mate. I don't know exactly shortest mate for >>it. It was solved by 11 moves by selective and searched only 9 moves deep by >>brute force. I can see 9 moves only during this night, since it took already 4.5 >>hours. It could be that Heiner, with speedier computer and hash, will say >>shortest mate before this. >> >>Cheers, >>Leonid. >> > >Hi Tim, Hi Leonid, > >Chest confirms that there is not mate-in-9. >Since that was my initial guess, I just restarted with depth=11. >For depth=9 I needed 19.2 minutes (K7/600 350MB hash). >The faster box is at work, not here at home, sorry. Thanks, Heiner! It happened to me in the past to put some wrong positions here few times. I thought that, probably, I did it this time. Cheers, Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.