Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 3 fold repetiton (Seacher v Postmodernist

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 13:31:48 03/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 02, 2002 at 08:51:57, Frank Phillips wrote:

>I moved first and then claimed the draw, which is probably wrong - thanks
>

Yep...9.4 below from the FIDE Laws is the key statement.  Seems very precise: I
wonder why.

Frank


9.2. The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by the player
having the move, when the same position, for at least the
third time (not necessarily by repetition of moves)

(a) is about to appear, if he first writes his move on his
scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make
this move, or

(b) has just appeared.

Positions as in (a) and (b) are considered the same, if the
same player has the move, pieces of the same kind and colour
occupy the same squares, and the possible moves of all the
pieces of both players are the same.
Positions are not the same if a pawn could have been captured
en passant or if the right to castle immediately or in the
future has been changed.

9.3. The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by the player
having the move, if

(a) he writes on his scoresheet, and declares to the arbiter
his intention to make a move which shall result in the last
50 moves having been made by each player without the movement
of any pawn and without the capture of any piece, or

(b) the last 50 consecutive moves have been made by each
player without the movement of any pawn and without the
capture of any piece.

9.4. If the player makes a move without having claimed the
draw he loses the right to claim, as in Article 9.2 or 9.3,
on that move .



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.