Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: (no text) Thanks Kurt just what I needed

Author: Les Fernandez

Date: 15:26:00 03/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 02, 2002 at 02:58:27, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On March 02, 2002 at 01:58:16, Les Fernandez wrote:
>
>>[D]8/8/4k3/8/6K1/5R2/8/8 w - -
>>
>>I was wondering what other engines report for the next move in this simple
>>position.  Crafty 17... reports a pv of Rd3 and I am curious to know if Rf5 just
>>as good.  It may seem like an irrevalent position but I do have interest in it.
>>It simply is solved by 3 piece egtb by any engine.  If results are as I hope I
>>may be posting several other positions with a similar request.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Crafty analysis:
>>
>>8/8/4k3/8/6K1/5R2/8/8 w - - acd 4; acn 7; acs 1; ce 32744; pv Rd3; c Rf5;
>
>New position
>8/8/4k3/8/6K1/5R2/8/8 w - - 0 1
>
>Fritz 7.0.0.6 says:
>Rd3 = mate in 12
>Rf5 = mate in 13
>Re3/Ra3/Rf2/Rg3/Rh3/Rf4 = mate in 14
>Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.