Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 3 fold repetiton (Seacher v Postmodernist

Author: Wylie Garvin

Date: 15:49:34 03/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


>
>According to PostModernist's log, PM made the move Qb6 before receiving the draw
>offer. PM doesn't accept draw offers. It waits for the server to tell it
>that the game is drawn.
>
>Andrew

It sounds as if Searcher is sending "offer draw" or whatever to the opponent.
Since the situation is a "claimed draw", it would make more sense for Searcher
to just declare the outcome a draw by sending a result string.  But I'm curious
why PM didn't recognize the repetition and claim the draw itself??

My humble two cents: A chess program should claim a draw anytime it is allowed
to.  Any other behaviour would only be advantageous in swindling human players,
which seems like bad etiquette for a chess program.  I.e. if two humans are
playing a match and they both overlook a repeated position, I can imagine that.
But if one player is a chess program, it should be capable of accurately
detecting repeated positions, and so it ought to "know" when a claimable draw
appears, and the courteous thing is for it to claim the draw.  Though I guess
you could make exceptions if you know you are playing a human GM or something..

wylie



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.