Author: Eran
Date: 18:59:01 03/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 02, 2002 at 19:13:15, Mike S. wrote: >On March 02, 2002 at 16:01:24, Eran wrote: > >>Jorge, >> >>Your info does not show me clearly how well Fritz7 with the new settings does. >>Your info about games must be in PGN format please. >>Also, you need to create two tournaments, Fritz7 vs. Shredder6, with two >>different Fritz7 settings each, new ones and default. So that I can compare the >>Fritz7 difference of strength. > >How do you handle the openings in your comparison matches? > >To compare the performance with the default setting, or any other setting, it >would be necessary to play from the *same opening lines* than in the comparison >match. Without that, I think the openings chosen will have more influence than >the settings. > >If I would do that (which I don't), I'd set the priority to a higher number of >games rather than to long time controls. I think, 120 games from 40/40:00 give a >more reliable result that 40 games from 40/2h. Furthermore it would probably be >useful to use a set of opening positions similar to the Nunn openings (as an >openings database) for that experiment. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl > >(my message 216068 disappeared, I'm curious what will happen with this one :o) For example: First Tournament: *Fritz7 new settings* (Fritz7 settings are the engine parameters) 120 games from 40/40:00 Nunn Openings Second Tournament: *Fritz7 default settings* 120 games from 40/40:00 Nunn Openings The only difference is the Fritz7 engine settings, and I want to know whether Fritz7 with new settings plays stronger or not. That is how I try to compare between the two tournaments above. Is that clear to you now? Eran
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.