Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Automated tournaments

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 12:41:25 06/29/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 29, 1998 at 14:53:33, Komputer Korner wrote:

>right now there are 5 automated publicly available ways to play matches between
>2 computer programs
>1) autoplayers
>2) chess servers
>3) Fritz engine vs engine GUI
>4) Winboard interface
>5) Kerrigan's interface
>
>Are there some I missed?
>
>Kerrigan has the advantage (so he says ) of being able to automate tournaments
>between x number of programs. If the others don't adopt this capability, they
>will be left behind as more and more programs will gravitate to the interface
>that allows automated matches. What say you programmers?

1.  To the best of my knowledge, Tom doesn't have such an interface.  He
has proposed a communication protocol that would make writing such an
interface possible.  But I'm not aware of his having written the program.

2.  The chess server is the most interesting approach, because it offers
the most possible games, at the cheapest cost.  Designing yet another
protocol into a chess program is a headache.  Once you can play on ICC,
you can play *anywhere*.  If you have a unix box, you can even install a
mini chess server if you want...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.