Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty message...............?true or ..............????????????

Author: Eelco de Groot

Date: 06:54:20 03/03/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 03, 2002 at 08:56:32, ramkumar wrote:

>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?216125

Hello, I see Gian-Carlo also answered your question. First Intel was built for
speed. But they realized their mistake and now they are testing for Crafty
performance. I don't know, maybe Nolan wrote this with a little irony? On the
other hand, he is an Intel man. If Intel is working at it at this moment, we can
expect results in about two years. Maybe Intel can afford to get two years
behind but not many companies can.

As Gian-carlo said Crafty for about a year at least is part of Spec-Int
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/ or probably a more recent link. This
was on single processor machines, I don't know if there is an equivalent
benchmark for multi-processor configurations, Crafty would be a good candidate.

(Aside note: We don't see much happening in that field, multi-processor
computers for the big market. Could just be part of the slowdown and the
recession in the tech-market of course. Maybe Christophe Theron is right and the
trend will be more towards smaller computers, hand-helds like Palms and Pocket
PCs. Another possibility, Local Area Networks and computers distributing tasks
that require much calculations and information sharing by much faster networks
than we have today, will be most important.(Like the way SETI searches
extraterrestrial messages with their screensavers). Certainly for the business
market and all office computing I think that trend is very important?)For
chessprograms the difficulty is hash-tables, they would have to be shared by all
linked computers in a networking chessprogram. Not the way Deep Blue did it
though, at least I'm sure not with Hsu's special-purpose chessplaying chips, so
it is not impossible to play chess without transposition tables.)

For video-gaming, the bottle-neck is more frame processing, the main processor
is not that important there, expensive video cards are.

Other people here are much more knowledgable in these things, so take this with
some sound skepticism,

Regards,
Eelco



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.