Author: leonid
Date: 07:12:40 03/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
>> >>Thanks, Heiner! >> >>Now I see that this is mate in 10. Probably, will put later mine to search mate >>in 10 in the night. It could take hours, after my time for 9 moves. I see that >>Chess Master found better by searching shorter mate in 10. Mine found by >>selective only mate in 11 in 2 seconds. Will look if few additional versions for >>selective will take this position in 10. This position was created last Summer >>and then I had few selective versions for search. > > >Just tried this position with new selective version and, bingo! Mate in 10 moves >in zero seconds. BIG LIE! Today I went to the same position and wanted to even improve my result by solving it under much milder conditions. It is when my yesterday mistake became obvious. I tried wrong position. Problem was that, usually, each mate position goes to hard disk just with one move in it. This had few. Missing this fact I had my ZERO seconds instead of real 8 MIN and 19 SEC. When I found this, I laughed for a good while. Each time when certain result goes exactly with what you expect then ideal time arrive to commit some mistake. Cheers, Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.