Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:59:58 03/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 2002 at 10:01:09, Nolan Denson wrote: >Look I am not sure what you all think of my post ... But it seems that many >think that Intel is this big giant that wants to hurt computer chess ... and >with many of the people that they employ ... do you find it hard to believe that >some of them play chess. What, I say here on this forum only represent myself >... and maybe I spoke too much, but I was only trying to let you all know that >people as well as companies make mistakes. Its recognizing those mistakes and >fixing them is what counts. Heck I wouldn't be surprise if they (AMD or Intel) >watch the post on this forum. Some of the post that are made here is true about >many of the bench marks between the 2 processor giants .... but many are flat >out lie's... some of you caught these post that weren't true. But take what you >want from my post. Why would you say that many people lied when they report benchmarks. How come most programmers after they intensenly test their programs with different microprocessors, about 90% still choose AMD instead of Intel; specially when they are going to represent their programs for an important match? Simply ask yourself why, and the rest is obvious. AMD is the KING for Chess. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.