Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 12:12:24 03/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2002 at 13:58:33, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 05, 2002 at 13:30:03, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On March 05, 2002 at 11:49:12, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>However, I think it's a bit premature and possibly misleading to state >>>categorically that today's programmes are above 2700+! >>> >> >>Let's say they are *about* 2700... a strong GM Level anyway. >> >>w.b.r. >>Otello > >I'd still say that's a tad optimistic, if scientific integrity is to be >maintained. But I'd feel relatively safe to say IMO top programmes on fast PC's >are about GM strength. Let's say that they will perform in a tournament like a GM. That is not the same as GM strength because they are different. For instance, I will take a GM to analyze certain (most of) positions over a program. As an analyst partner, computers provide correctness without a clue many many times. GMs had excellent ideas but the execution is not always flawless. Regards, Miguel > >Regards, > Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.