Author: Steve
Date: 18:16:51 03/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2002 at 00:10:46, John Merlino wrote: >On March 04, 2002 at 22:25:28, Sally Weltrop wrote: > >>On March 04, 2002 at 22:23:28, Sally Weltrop wrote: >> >>>[D]6k1/6pp/2qb4/8/2pQrNN1/1p3RPP/5P1K/r1B5 w - - 0 36 >>> >>>of course 36)Qxa1 and Black resigns next move! >> >> >>this is taken from the 9th rd of Linares 2002 >> >>Shirov,A (2715) - Ivanchuk,V (2717) [C88] >>Linares SuperGM Linares (9), 04.03.2002 >> >>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.a4 Bb7 9.d3 >>Re8 10.Nbd2 Bf8 11.c3 Na5 12.Ba2 c5 13.d4 d6 14.b4 exd4 15.bxa5 dxc3 16.Nf1 Nxe4 >>17.axb5 axb5 18.a6 Bc6 19.Rxe4 Bxe4 20.Bxf7+ Kxf7 21.Ng5+ Kg8 22.Nxe4 Qc8 >>23.Nxc3 Rxa6 24.Rb1 b4 25.Nd5 Ra7 26.Rb3 Ra1 27.h3 Re5 28.Nf4 Qe8 29.Rf3 c4 >>30.Kh2 b3 31.Qd2 d5 32.Ne3 Bd6 33.g3 Qc6 34.Ng4 d4 35.Qxd4 Re4 36.Qxa1 1-0 > >Two blunders in a row! (perhaps a victim of time pressure heading towards time >control?) > >After 34.Ng4, Ivanchuk is clearly in the lead: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -1.86 1524 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra2 36.Ne6 >0:00 1/4 -2.47 6025 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra2 36.Rd3 Rc2 >0:00 2/5 -2.31 21581 34...Rf5 35.Bb2 Ra2 36.Ne3 Rxf4 > 37.gxf4 >0:00 2/6 -1.98 64702 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra7 36.Bb2 Bxf4 > 37.Rxf4 Rxf4 38.gxf4 >0:02 3/7 -1.90 217927 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra7 36.Ne6 Rxf3 > 37.Qxf3 Bb4 38.Nd4 Qd6 >0:08 3/8 -1.47 707718 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra7 36.Ne6 Rxf3 > 37.Qxf3 h5 38.Nd4 Qc5 >0:40 4/9 -1.49 3345172 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra7 36.Ne3 Be5 > 37.Qb4 Rff7 38.Nexd5 Bxf4 39.Nxf4 > Qxf3 40.Qb8+ Rf8 41.Qxa7 >2:45 4/10 -1.51 14440411 34...Rf5 35.Qc3 Ra7 36.Ne6 Rxf3 > 37.Qxf3 h5 38.Ne5 Bxe5 39.Qf8+ > Kh7 40.Qf5+ g6 41.Qxe5 > >But when the game is over.... > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 3.38 3069 36...Re1 37.Nh5 Qb7 38.Ne3 >0:00 1/4 3.50 10479 36...Re1 37.Nh5 Qb7 38.Qa5 Qxf3 > 39.Qxe1 >0:00 2/5 3.28 34108 36...Re1 37.Nh5 Qb7 38.Kg2 Bb4 > 39.Qb2 >0:01 2/6 5.73 116307 36...Re1 37.Qxg7+ Kxg7 38.Nh5+ > Kh8 39.Bb2+ c3 40.Bxc3+ Qxc3 41.Rxc3 > Re8 42.Rxb3 Re2 >0:01 2/6 4.06 165811 36...Re7 37.Kg2 Re1 38.Nh5 Bf8 > 39.Qc3 Qe6 40.Ne3 >0:02 2/6 3.96 190722 36...Rxf4 37.Rxf4 Bxf4 38.Bxf4 > c3 39.Ne5 Qc5 40.Qa8+ Qf8 >0:04 3/7 4.00 355447 36...Rxf4 37.Rxf4 Bxf4 38.Bxf4 > c3 39.Qd1 Qb7 40.Qd8+ Kf7 41.f3 >0:07 3/8 4.87 709846 36...Rxf4 37.Rxf4 Bxf4 38.Bxf4 > c3 39.Qa7 h5 40.Be5 Qg6 41.Qb8+ > Kh7 42.Qxb3 hxg4 43.Qxc3 gxh3 44.Kxh3 > Qh5+ 45.Kg2 >0:32 3/8 4.76 2874367 36...Qb7 37.Bb2 h5 38.Ne3 Bxf4 > 39.Rxf4 Rxf4 40.gxf4 Qe4 41.Bxg7 > Qxf4+ 42.Kg1 >0:54 3/8 4.71 4928413 36...Bxf4 37.Bxf4 Re6 38.Ne5 Qd5 > 39.Kg2 Rb6 40.Qb2 >1:41 4/9 5.06 9349513 36...Bxf4 37.Bxf4 Re6 38.Ne5 Qd5 > 39.Kg2 Re7 40.Qc1 Rc7 41.Qb2 > >ouch.... I don't feel so bad now when I hang a pawn.... ;-) > >jm 14.4 million positions and a search depth of 4 ply? What am I missing?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.