Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:05:18 03/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 05, 2002 at 15:12:24, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On March 05, 2002 at 13:58:33, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On March 05, 2002 at 13:30:03, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On March 05, 2002 at 11:49:12, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>However, I think it's a bit premature and possibly misleading to state >>>>categorically that today's programmes are above 2700+! >>>> >>> >>>Let's say they are *about* 2700... a strong GM Level anyway. >>> >>>w.b.r. >>>Otello >> >>I'd still say that's a tad optimistic, if scientific integrity is to be >>maintained. But I'd feel relatively safe to say IMO top programmes on fast PC's >>are about GM strength. > >Let's say that they will perform in a tournament like a GM. >That is not the same as GM strength because they are different. >For instance, I will take a GM to analyze certain (most of) positions over >a program. As an analyst partner, computers provide correctness without a clue >many many times. GMs had excellent ideas but the execution is not always >flawless. > >Regards, >Miguel > > Thanks Miguel! You're description is most insightful and informative. > >> >>Regards, >> Terry
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.