Author: Nicholas Cooper
Date: 21:09:08 03/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Jaco, I have found exactly the same thing, with the full analysis feature being aimed more towards beginning players in my opinion, particularly with the usually irrelevant text commentry! Not only does the Blunder Check option give more analytical depth, it can also check embedded variations, which is very useful as I like to add my analytical thoughts immediately after playing a game. Using Blunder Check I can then check the calculations my decisions were based upon, in addition to the moves of the game itself. Just my 2c worth... Regards, Nick :) On March 05, 2002 at 15:42:20, Jaco van Tonder wrote: >Hi > >Got Shredder 6 a few weeks back, and have been using it to annotate my club >games. It has a variety of analysis options, of which I though "Full Analysis" >would be the most flexible. I was however disappointed at the level of detail >given in the "Full Analysis" annotations. The annotations I got have been >limited to !'s and ?'s for good and dumb moves, with alternative variations >given restricted to only 2 or 3 moves per variation. This is simply not good >enough. Sometimes the reason I missed something, is because the alternative >winning variation takes 6 or 7 moves to reach its logical conclusion. But >Shredder won't give the variations down to moves 6 or 7 in this mode, so it is >rather useless. > >To my surprise I have found the "Blunder check" analysis option more useful, as >it gives the full analysis line that the computer has found. > >I am curious what other Chessbase Engine owners use to annotate their own games >with. Any tips? > >Thanks >Jaco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.