Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Castling is not possible

Author: Bernhard Bauer

Date: 02:29:30 03/06/02

Go up one level in this thread

On March 06, 2002 at 05:17:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On March 06, 2002 at 05:14:57, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>
>>Do you really think the Washington Post gave the position in EPD?
>
>I don't know what the Washington Post gave, but the position
>as posted here was not correct.
>
>If they only have the diagram, it was ambiguous.
>
>--
>GCP

You don't know what the Washington Post gave?  :-)))
The poster who started this thread did't convert the position to correct epd as
he was not aware of castling.
If they only give the diagram you have to assume every posibility. So a diagram
is *not* ambiguous.
In any case, table bases will not help, whether the epd string is right or
wrong.
Admit it, even it may be dificult, you were plain wrong.
Kind regards
Bernhard

• Re: Castling is not possible David Dory 05:58:40 03/06/02
  • Re: Castling is not possible; What Terry Dave? Terry McCracken 07:28:19 03/06/02
    • What Terry Dave? Opps Terry Ripple I Presume? Terry McCracken 07:36:52 03/06/02
  • Re: Castling is not possible Bernhard Bauer 06:19:12 03/06/02
    • Re: Castling is not possible Heiner Marxen 08:19:10 03/06/02
  • Re: Castling is not possible Uri Blass 06:12:05 03/06/02
    • Re: Castling is not possible Bernhard Bauer 06:39:13 03/06/02
      • Re: Castling is not possible Joe Pechie 09:48:47 03/06/02
        • Re: Castling is not possible Terry McCracken 12:41:14 03/06/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.