Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:25:07 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 11:56:02, Terry McCracken wrote: >On March 06, 2002 at 11:30:38, Heiner Marxen wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 11:20:17, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>[D]8/8/8/8/8/6P1/6k1/4KR1R w >>> >>> >>>Mate in 3 >>> >>>Terry >> >>Yes, clever indeed, but only if you add the king side castling right for white. >>Then: >> >> Rf4 Kxg3 O-O Kh3 R1f3# >> Kxh1 Kf2 Kh2 Rh4# >> >>I like it :-) >> >>Cheers, >>Heiner > >Yes, clever indeed, but only if you add the king side castling right for white. > >That's the point, you _must_ assume when given a problem when the King is on >it's initial square along with it's Rook or Rooks that 0-0 or 0-0-0 is >permissible. If there is only a diagram you are right but if there is a FEN you are wrong. The poster failed to post a diagram without a FEN so he can blame only himself. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.