Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger 14 is better than 27th

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:02:04 03/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 06, 2002 at 12:41:43, Roy Eassa wrote:

>On March 06, 2002 at 08:38:54, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Team Tournament  60'/60  P3 1.0/256  AP
>>Wels, 2002 - 2002.02.14
>>                      Score       1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 1: Fritz 7 NoMMX    8.5 /  9    4w+  9w+ 26w+ 30b+ 19b+ 28b= 11w+ 10b+ 16b+
>> 2: Shredder 6       7.0 /  9   17w+  5b= 21w+ 22b=  3w+ 27b+ 25b=  8w= 24b+
>> 3: Nimzo 8          6.5 /  9   21b+ 24w+ 22b= 27w+  2b- 25b=  8b+ 17w+  5b=
>> 4: Century 4        6.5 /  9    1b- 28w+ 16w+  9b- 10b+ 11w= 19w+ 30b+ 26w+
>> 5: Fritz 7a         6.5 /  9   22b+  2w=  8b= 25w+ 24b= 21w+ 17b= 27w+  3w=
>> 6: Gandalf 3        6.0 /  9   18b+ 12w+ 29b- 20w=  7b- 13w= 14w+ 23b+ 15b+
>> 7: Genius 6.5       6.0 /  9   23w= 13w= 18b= 12w+  6w+ 14b= 15b= 20w= 29b+
>> 8: Junior 7         6.0 /  9   27w+ 17b+  5w= 21b+ 25w+ 24b-  3w-  2b= 22w+
>> 9: Shredder 5       5.5 /  9   11b-  1b- 28b+  4w+ 16b= 10w+ 30w+ 26b+ 19w-
>>10: Gambit Tiger 2   5.5 /  9   26w+ 30b= 19w+ 16w+  4w-  9b- 28b+  1w- 11b+
>>11: Gandalf 4.32h    5.5 /  9    9w+ 26b+ 30w+ 19b= 28w+  4b=  1b- 16w= 10w-
>>12: Junior 5         5.5 /  9   15w-  6b- 14w+  7b- 29w+ 20b+ 23w+ 18b+ 13w=
>>13: Century 3.2      5.0 /  9   14w-  7b= 23b+ 18w= 15w+  6b= 20b- 29w+ 12b=
>>14: Fritz 6 Old      5.0 /  9   13b+ 18w+ 12b- 29w+ 20b+  7w=  6b- 15w= 23w-
>>15: Chess Tiger 13   4.5 /  9   12b+ 29w+ 20b+ 23b= 13b- 18w-  7w= 14b=  6w-
>>16: Nimzo 7.32       4.5 /  9   28w+ 19b+  4b- 10b-  9w= 30w= 26w+ 11b=  1w-
>>17: Gandalf 5        4.5 /  9    2b-  8w- 25b+ 24w+ 21b- 22w+  5w=  3b- 27b+
>>18: Shredder 4       4.5 /  9    6w- 14b-  7w= 13b= 23w+ 15b+ 29b+ 12w- 20b=
>>19: SOS 11/2000      4.0 /  9   30w+ 16w- 10b- 11w=  1w- 26b=  4b- 28w+  9b+
>>20: Comet B37        4.0 /  9   29b+ 23b= 15w-  6b= 14w- 12w- 13w+  7b= 18w=
>>21: Hiarcs 7.32      4.0 /  9    3w- 22w+  2b-  8w- 17w+  5b- 27b= 24w+ 25b=
>>22: TheKing 3.12d    3.5 /  9    5w- 21b-  3w=  2w= 27w= 17b- 24b+ 25w+  8b-
>>23: Nimzo 2000b      3.5 /  9    7b= 20w= 13w- 15w= 18b- 29b+ 12b-  6w- 14b+
>>24: Yace 0.99.56     2.5 /  9   25b=  3b- 27w= 17b-  5w=  8w+ 22w- 21b-  2w-
>>25: Crafty 18.13     2.5 /  9   24w= 27b= 17w-  5b-  8b-  3w=  2w= 22b- 21w=
>>26: Junior 6         2.5 /  9   10b- 11w-  1b- 28w+ 30b+ 19w= 16b-  9w-  4b-
>>27: Chess Tiger 14   2.0 /  9    8b- 25w= 24b=  3b- 22b=  2w- 21w=  5b- 17w-
>>28: Hiarcs 6         1.5 /  9   16b-  4b-  9w- 26b- 11b-  1w= 10w- 19b- 30w+
>>29: MChess Pro 7.1   1.0 /  9   20w- 15b-  6w+ 14b- 12b- 23w- 18w- 13b-  7w-
>>30: Zarkov 5         1.0 /  9   19b- 10w= 11b-  1w- 26w- 16b=  9b-  4w- 28b-

It is clear that chesstiger played better opponent because it only played
against opponents on board 1.

This table is unfair and it was better not to post it.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.