Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Another Clever Problem; Samuel Loyd New York Albion 1857 (SPOILER)

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 11:26:54 03/06/02

Go up one level in this thread

On March 06, 2002 at 14:12:35, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On March 06, 2002 at 14:07:15, Terry McCracken wrote:
>[snip[
>>Ok then! Well then simply put you must consider castling is a possible option:)
>>If too much is said, then the problem becomes mundane.
>
>Where do the assumptions stop?
>Might pawns be e.p. vulnerable?
>Might we be playing a chess variant?
>
>The problem as stated is simply buggy.

You _must_ keep all options, possibilities open!

Then your mind is Free to Solve the problem/s:o)

Terry

• Re: Another Clever Problem; Samuel Loyd New York Albion 1857 (SPOILER) Dann Corbit 11:33:05 03/06/02
  • Re: Another Clever Problem; Samuel Loyd New York Albion 1857 (SPOILER) Terry McCracken 12:00:46 03/06/02
    • Re: Another Clever Problem; Samuel Loyd New York Albion 1857 (SPOILER) Dann Corbit 12:05:01 03/06/02
      • Re: Another Clever Problem; Samuel Loyd New York Albion 1857 (SPOILER) Terry McCracken 12:16:47 03/06/02
      • Illegal position!!! :) Daniel Clausen 12:10:33 03/06/02
        • Just few pieces more. Still position is very easy. leonid 05:47:50 03/07/02
          • Re: Just few pieces more. Still position is very easy. Heiner Marxen 08:09:41 03/07/02
            • Re: Just few pieces more. Still position is very easy. leonid 08:23:42 03/07/02
        • Re: Illegal position!!! :) Dann Corbit 12:32:29 03/06/02
        • Re: Illegal position!!! :) Dann Corbit 12:32:04 03/06/02
    • Re: Another Clever Problem; Samuel Loyd New York Albion 1857 (SPOILER) Terry McCracken 12:03:53 03/06/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.