Author: Rafael Andrist
Date: 11:52:31 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 12:25:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 06, 2002 at 11:56:02, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 11:30:38, Heiner Marxen wrote: >> >>>On March 06, 2002 at 11:20:17, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>[D]8/8/8/8/8/6P1/6k1/4KR1R w >>>> >>>> >>>>Mate in 3 >>>> >>>>Terry >>> >>>Yes, clever indeed, but only if you add the king side castling right for white. >>>Then: >>> >>> Rf4 Kxg3 O-O Kh3 R1f3# >>> Kxh1 Kf2 Kh2 Rh4# >>> >>>I like it :-) >>> >>>Cheers, >>>Heiner >> >>Yes, clever indeed, but only if you add the king side castling right for white. >> >>That's the point, you _must_ assume when given a problem when the King is on >>it's initial square along with it's Rook or Rooks that 0-0 or 0-0-0 is >>permissible. > >If there is only a diagram you are right but if there is a FEN you are wrong. >The poster failed to post a diagram without a FEN so he can blame only himself. > >Uri No, In this case the FEN/EPD (whatever it should be) is incomplete. It may or may not possible to castle. Rafael B. Andrist
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.