Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 12:40:56 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 15:27:19, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On March 06, 2002 at 15:15:54, Frank Phillips wrote: > >>if no castling rights are indicated in the fen string, is it normal to consider >>that castling is possible - except where it obviously is not in Black's case? > >Excuse me!? > > >>(In evidence to contrary my program assumes castling is not possible. > >No it's not assuming! FEN is _defined_ in that way! No castling indication in >the FEN string means there are no castling rights! > >Sargon Um, with "no indication of castling rights" I meant a '-' sign. Maybe not write down anything doesn't violate the FEN definition, I don't know. In this case, skipping that info would be a valid way to let the question of castling rights open. Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.