Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:31:14 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 13:37:44, Chris Carson wrote: >On March 06, 2002 at 11:02:21, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On March 06, 2002 at 07:16:27, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>The SSDF has the proper ELO calibration for programs vs GM's. >>>http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/ >>> >>>See Tony's page for Human vs Machine results (look at calibration games): >>>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/welcome.htm >>> >>>and (my list on Tony's Page): >>> >>>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/manmachine.htm >> >> >>Chris been here and it's all good and nice, but until the F.I.D.E. allows the >>same rights for machines as it does humans, you'll not see enough games to >>prove that today's programmes are GM's or GM strength, let alone 2700+! >> >>Terry > >All data points to this. You should ask the people who think it is lower to >provide data to back up the claims (tournament/match conditions in public the >same as these tournaments and matches). > >Just saying it is lower does not make it so. Which to that I'll add, "Just saying it's higher does not make it so!:> Well Chris, I guess I'm a Super GM! I beat RC4 two games in a row! And I didn't use "Anti-Computer Play" either!:o) But I did force it down to a winning endgame. I nailed Deep Fritz 6 without anti-computer play as well in 27 moves, Checkmate! Sorry I haven't the game scores, but then again people may think I fabricated the games!;-) Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.