Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 20:50:52 03/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 2002 at 19:18:16, Slater Wold wrote: >Hyatt said in an earlier post that TB's don't take into account the ability to >castle because it would be a waste. > >However, when I feed this position into any engine, it solves it in 0.00 as a TB >win. > >[D]5Q1Q/5Q1Q/5Q1Q/5Q1Q/8/6P1/6k1/4KR1R w K - > >It shows 20 possible moves, all from TB's I am guessing. > >I cannot cut and paste the eval, because there isn't one, but I have: > >1.+ - (#4) Rf4 >2.+ - (#4) Kd1 >3.+ - (#4) Kd2 >4.+ - (#4) Ke2 >5.+ - (#4) Rf5 >6.+ - (#4) Rf6 >7.+ - (#4) Rf7 >8.+ - (#4) Rf8 >9.+ - (#4) Rhg1+ >10.+ - (#4) Rh4 >11.+ - (#4) Rh5 >12.+ - (#4) Rh6 >13.+ - (#4) Rh7 >14.+ - (#4) Rh8 >15.+ - (#5) g4 >16.+ - (#5) Rh2+ >17.+ - (#6) Rfg1+ >18.+ - (#5) Rf2+ >19.+ - (#10) Rh3 >20.+ - (#11) Rf3 > >_Several_ of these moves take castling into accout. Actually, Rf4 (and other of these moves) should be #3 if castling is taken into account, not #4 as shown. >After Rf4 Kxg3 my TB's show 28 moves. The first move is 1. + - (#2) O-O, the >last is 28. + - (#15) Rh8. Moves don't come from the TB, the chess engine generates all the moves, and feeds the resulting positions into the TB, which returns a mate score.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.