Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:07:24 03/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 2002 at 12:00:31, Ed Schröder wrote: >I had the pleasure to have some serious talks about computers with Loek, he >knows how to play the computer much more than I expected. Note his comment on >12.Bg3? in game-2: I never would play such a move, but I knew the computer would >take the bishop. If he knew anything about computers he would have known his game setup in game 3 was a 100% sure zero. I can't remember i *ever* drew a similar setup where i gave the thing options to either win queen side AND attack my king. You kind of *force* them to attack king side, which nowadays they all do. Which in fact happened. With the known result. Any person who knows something about computers is not forcing them into a kings attack which is good. Loek obviously tried this setup the first time in his life, otherwise he would not have chosen it. so the assumption he knows something about the thing is exaggerated. All he knows is that it is a machine. >During game-1 and game-3 he told me: "this is not the same version playing as >you have send me". Imagine that! I bet he never installed Rebel Century, but only Rebel Tiger. I didn't figure it out either until Jan Louwman told me Rebel Century was still alive :) >Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.