Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder 6 Vs Shredder Paderborn Ended W6 L2 D4

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 04:30:50 03/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 08, 2002 at 06:55:28, Andrew Williams wrote:

>>After 12 games I decided to stop the match since Shredder 6 was winning
>>by a big margin.
>>
>>
>
>Really, there is no reason to stop here. I have gone to bed with a new
>version of PostModernist beating an old version 10-0 and woken up with them
>approximately even. If I *really* want to know if a new version is better than
>an old, I would normally prefer something like 200 games. I play (say) 100
>openings and make each version play black and white for each opening. Even then,
>this isn't a tremendously good way of testing two similar versions.
>
>Andrew

I agree that 6-2 and 4 draws is not a significant result but
10-0 may be a significant result unless you know that the change  is really a
very small change.

If you expect a change of 100 elo from the new version than 10-0 for the new
version is a significant result

If you expect 1 elo change then even 20-0 for the new version is not a
significant result if you still believe that you did not do a more signiicant
change.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.