Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A Missed Mate in 4

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:56:59 03/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 08, 2002 at 09:34:18, Art Basham wrote:

>It took Deep Junior 7 nine ply to see a mate in 4?
>
>I wonder why, I never could figure that out?

No

Depth 9 of Junior is not 9 plies
Junior has an original definition of depth.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.