Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:08:49 03/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2002 at 08:20:41, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On March 08, 2002 at 05:06:31, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On March 07, 2002 at 20:09:25, mike schoonover wrote: >> >>>i can see where this thread is going to turn into a real >>>pissing contest. :) >>>i wish the best to gulko.he his a fine chess player. >> >>I do to, I have always enjoyed his games and respected his play. >> >>>he's the best sentimental favorite so far. >>>go G!give them processers stack overflows. >> >>Give em hell, hope he wins and takes them down. >> >>>regards >>>mike > >Sorry to say this but wishful thinking will NOT help Mr.Gulko, the only thing >that would help him is if the organizer dicides to use a slow computer like a >Athlon 700 Mhz. But at this time control even a mere 700 Mhz would tare him >apart. Maybe or maybe not. I watched a GM "dismantle" a very fast AMD box last week 6 games in a row... and 8 out of 10 games overall. And the time control was a very slow 3 0... The GMs are dangerous. _very_ dangerous. To think otherwise is very foolish. Chess is a _long_ way from being solved by computers...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.